Re: Arsenal sign deer94

Sun Apr 24 2016, 13:34

xOscar wrote:

mlfaijati wrote:we don't have to accept inherent flaws in the system, just use the waivers system i've proposed

..Thus accepting the inherent flaws in that system..

How the fuck is fixing the problem accepting the flaws in the problem?

Also the system I'm proposing is the second half of my post earlier in this thread, the first part is just thoughts about how the waivers system is being used.

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:18 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

mlfaijati wrote:

xOscar wrote:

mlfaijati wrote:we don't have to accept inherent flaws in the system, just use the waivers system i've proposed

..Thus accepting the inherent flaws in that system (ie. your proposed system)..

How the fuck is fixing the problem accepting the flaws in the problem?

... As in we would have to accept the inherent flaws in the proposal you'd made... Like the obvious one you pointed out yourself. (Again, i'm not judging the proposal, i'm just saying that there will always be inherent flaws that you have to accept to participate in said system)

By definition inherent flaws are those that cannot be eliminated, only mitigated to an acceptable level. Otherwise they would be flaws and not inherent flaws. You either accept the inherent flaws in whichever system is being used, or you pick up your ball and go home Thumb Up

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:26 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

B4D 4SS wrote: there arent flaws, the argument is that new players have 2 wait till next season and might lose interest, but look at the players who've been signed and see how many are actually new players, its all players who play in other leagues or have played in previous premhax ssn's.

and the other point of teams needing to sign players mid-season say if some players go inactive, they cud sign the players who weren't picked from the draft, it wud be same system as it was in beginning of season wen u were only allowed 2 sign players from draft who weren't picked, which wud work just fine

... How can you say there aren't flaws, and then talk about a) the flaws which i was already discussing, and b) a system that mitigates the flaws... which i was already discussing Facepalm

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:35 Message reputation : 0% (1 vote)

so essentially your post was saying nothing, other than there are problems in the waivers system and we shouldn't do anything to rectify it?

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:43

xOscar wrote:Maybe i should clarify ... My over-riding point being; all we can therefore do is accept inherent flaws as part of the parcel, for what is after all, just a casual 2d flash game.

xx

Pretty much.

But i think you're still missing the concept of something that is inherent. It doesn't mean you should do nothing, it just means whatever you do, it will still be flawed. You just have to get on with it. Whether it be the current flawed system, your flawed system, b4ds flawed system or anyone else's. It is inherently flawed. So either have to accept it, or pick up your ball and go home Thumb Up

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:44 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

I believe he's suggesting we are always going find problems with the waivers system, no matter how much we try and fix it up each season.

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:46 Message reputation : 100% (2 votes)

Not that I agree, I think we should always be looking to change things up, at least until we find the system that suits most people well. Also little changes each season keep things a little more refreshing for me.

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:48 Message reputation : 100% (2 votes)

insteaf of a draft Sheep

imagine player auctions

Sun Apr 24 2016, 14:59 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

auctions systems are da best tbh

Sun Apr 24 2016, 15:08

xOscar wrote:

B4D 4SS wrote: there arent flaws, the argument is that new players have 2 wait till next season and might lose interest, but look at the players who've been signed and see how many are actually new players, its all players who play in other leagues or have played in previous premhax ssn's.

and the other point of teams needing to sign players mid-season say if some players go inactive, they cud sign the players who weren't picked from the draft, it wud be same system as it was in beginning of season wen u were only allowed 2 sign players from draft who weren't picked, which wud work just fine

... How can you say there aren't flaws, and then talk about a) the flaws which i was already discussing, and b) a system that mitigates the flaws... which i was already discussing

stop overcomplicating simple things nd tell me the flaw with my system

Sun Apr 24 2016, 15:35 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

nero wrote:insteaf of a draft imagine player auctions

I'm interested - how will it work?

Sun Apr 24 2016, 16:03 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

socrates wrote:

nero wrote:insteaf of a draft imagine player auctions

I'm interested - how will it work?

Every captain has 100 coins for example, then we action everyone, player for player and the highest bidder takes the player. And this goes on until every player is gone.

Sun Apr 24 2016, 16:29

Could be worth a try - if it fails could always return to draft

Mon Apr 25 2016, 00:15

confrimmed

Tue Apr 26 2016, 00:35 Message reputation : 100% (2 votes)

inb4 soc spends all 100 coins on ghost

Tue Apr 26 2016, 09:42 Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)

I'm worth it, baby.

Tue Apr 26 2016, 10:26

Didn't you see his sexy passing yesterday? Definitely worth it!

Thu Apr 28 2016, 20:32 Message reputation : 0% (1 vote)

Didn't realise I'd cause this much hassle tbh